After both parties had completed the presentation of evidence and arguments, the judge took under advisement a case tried without a jury. The case involves a difficult issue of causation and a difficult issue of law. Was it proper for the attorney to communicate with the judge?

After both parties had completed the presentation of evidence and arguments, the judge took under advisement a case tried without a jury. The case involves a difficult issue of causation and a difficult issue of law. Was it proper for the attorney to communicate with the judge?

• A. Yes, because counsel may communicate with the judge on pending matters.
• B. No, because the attorney communicated with the judge on a pending matter without advising opposing counsel.
• C. Yes, because the judge is not required to wait for counsel's response.
• D. No, because communications with the judge should occur only through the court clerk.

Answer: (B)